Back to interface with version 5.5

I agree with the user GUI problem. I understand the current perception that the GUI needs to be "dumbed-down" for the overall potential user base, but at least let there be a "advanced" or "experienced" user mode. Other wise, it seems to be very complete and well written. The only real issue I have beyond the GUI is the method of estimating the impact of problems, example is disk fragmenting where sometimes with 4 or 5 fragmented files the projected impact can be either low or high. It would be good to indicate that issues were found in "critical" system files making the impact high.